ONCALL
...Evidence
......Relevance
12 Cards On This Topic:

Trial ct. did not err in admitting rap lyrics into evidence where they were relevant and no prejudice was demonstrated.

Trial ct. properly excluded witness testimony purportedly showing that child-victim sought out the companionship of adult men where it did not tend to prove or disprove that defendant engaged in molestation of victim.

Testimony that plaintiff knew another employee had been terminated for reporting sexual harassment properly excluded under EC §352.

No abuse of discretion in admitting evidence of defendant's prior bad acts under Evid. Code §352.

Evidence of defendant's intoxication properly excluded under EC §§350 and 352 where it was inadmissible to negate presence of general criminal intent.

Error to admit D's prior 1992 conviction under EC §352 where the incident was too factually dissimilar from the current charge against him; error prejudicial.

Judgment reversed where trial ct. allowed evidence of incidents irrelevant to plaintiff's nuisance claim; error was prejudicial.

Trial ct.'s denial of defendant's request to wear his wedding ring in the courtroom was a proper act of discretion under EC §352.

Prosecution's timeline did not properly constitute demonstrative evidence where it contained inadmissible hearsay used to bolster alleged victim's credibility; court's error in allowing display of timeline was prejudicial.

Handwritten rap lyrics admitted at D's murder trial were relevant and not unduly prejudicial.

Evidence is not speculative, and therefore irrelevant under EC §350, merely because inferences are required to find its relevance.

In a criminal proceeding, a confidential communication recorded without the consent of all parties to the communication is admissible if relevant and not subject to exclusion under the U.S. Constitution.