CHILDREN AND THE LAW
...Dependency Petitions
......Jurisdictional Hearing
.........Jurisdictional Grounds
............300(g): Absent Parent/Abandonment
15 Cards On This Topic:
  • Petition for dependency may be sustained if child left with provision for support, voluntarily surrendered and not reclaimed, or parent incarcerated.
  • Juvenile ct. erred in finding jurisdiction under W&IC 300(b) & (g) as none of the allegations that F failed to provide for C was supported by substantial evidence ••at the time of the jurisdiction/disposition hearing••.
  • No basis for W&IC 300(b) and (g) jurisdiction where mother arranged for care of C before jurisdiction/disposition hearing; if it didn't work out, she could easily have been located [in jail] to make other arrangements.
  • Finding of W&IC 300(g) jurisdiction not supported by substantial evidence where mother and grandmother provided C with sufficient support-that F did not contribute did not justify jurisdiction.
  • No causal nexus between juvenile court's findings of serious injury to Cs by mother and SF and the findings of absent F's failure to provide for Cs' necessities and medical care.
  • As substantial evidence supported court's conclusion C had been left without any provision for support and needed court protection as a dependent child, parents' attempt to divert focus to their interests without merit.
  • Though incarcerated F waived right to challenge sufficiency of dependency allegations, allegations sufficient to confer jurisdiction on juv. court; substantial evidence supported jurisdictional findings under W&IC 300b and g.
  • As mother left minor with grandparents but didn't give them legal custody, court could reasonably find she was unable to arrange care, and W&IC 300 (g) jurisdiction supported by substantial evidence.
  • Court did not have jurisdiction to terminate parental rights of incarcerated mother who could arrange for child's care but was ineffectively represented by counsel who misunderstood W&IC section.
  • Although absent parent allegation true, it was not basis for referral; it would be anomalous to permit fact of an absent father to be the sole justification to assert jurisdiction and to detain Cs from mother.
  • No evidence to support 300(g) allegation simply because mother delusional.
  • Dependency supported by substantial evidence that M left by mother with no means of support and incarcerated F unable to make suitable arrangements.
  • Father’s incarceration insufficient to justify dependency, unless father incapable of arranging for minor’s care at time of hearing.
  • Aging relative who would not qualify for long-term custody under a guardianship petition may still be able to provide adequate care during parent’s prison term.
  • Reunification services for incarcerated parents.