PRETRIAL ADJUDICATION
...
Summary Judgment & Summary Adjudication
......
Posthearing Possibilities: SJ Granted
.........Code Civ. Proc. §473 Relief
11 Cards On This Topic:
Code Civ. Proc. §473 relief available after grant of summary judgment.
No abuse of discretion in denying P's request for CCP 473 discretionary relief from SJ where atty's mistakes were inexcusable; P also not entitled to mandatory relief because it is not available for SJs.
P not entitled to CCP 473(b) relief where she filed motion w/in 6 mos after entry of SJ but did not serve it, and both filed and served 2d motion after 6-month period expired; D contesting merits at hearing did not waive time limit.
Court has no authority under CCP 473 (b) to excuse a party's noncompliance with the 6-month time limit of that very statute.
Mandatory attorney fault provision of CCP 473(b) does not empower court to set aside a summary judgment, only a default judgment or a dismissal.
CCP 473 motion seeking discretionary relief, with attorney's declaration suggesting fault does not require court to grant relief under mandatory provision for attorney fault where no request for mandatory relief.
Super. ct. lacked jurisdiction under Code Civ. Proc. §473 to reconsider grant of SJ where inadvertence asserted by counsel was no more than late recognition of inadequate briefing.
Code Civ. Proc. §473 applies to grant of summary judgment.
SJ for P properly set aside for inadvertence and excusable neglect.
Motion for relief under Code Civ. Proc. §473 is addressed to sound discretion of trial ct.
Code Civ. Proc. §473 relief denied due to failure of moving party to show counsel’s inadvertence or excusable neglect.