CALIFORNIA FAMILY LAW
...Spousal Support
......Amount
.........Factors Considered
............Income/Paying Spse
16 Cards On This Topic:
  • When making spousal support award, court must consider income of paying spouse from all sources.
  • Where payor’s income is volatile and varies significantly from year to year, trial ct. cannot base spousal support order on two-year-old numbers.
  • H entitled to testify as to own income; not required to hire an expert.
  • If paying spouse loses job, court should reduce support during period of unemployment with condition that it automatically reinstate upon reemployment.
  • When corporation is paying spouse's alter ego, in determining ability to pay spousal support, court will look to corporation's ability to pay.
  • Court may look to financial condition of H's business in determining his ability to pay support.
  • Ability of each spouse to earn, as well as actual income, relevant to award of spousal support.
  • Court should consider all factors, including ability to earn and actual earnings.
  • Income from pension which paying spouse received in exchange for other assets is available for spousal support.
  • Lottery winnings are income for support purposes, rather than property.
  • Court properly refused to consider H's gambling winnings in determining ability to pay support.
  • Spousal support order based on sliding scale of paying spouse's earnings held abuse of discretion.
  • H's denial of W's allegations of his net worth and income, without stating affirmatively what they were, held equivalent to admission.
  • Determining a party's true income.
  • Unexercised stock option appreciation, given by employer as part of executive compensation package, should be included in recipient's "gross income" for child support calculation. (Ohio.)
  • New mate-nonmarital partner income.