CALIFORNIA FAMILY LAW
...
Spousal Support
......
Modification
.........
Change of Circumstances
............Changed Circs - Not Sufficient
13 Cards On This Topic:
Increased inequality of income is not in itself a material change of circumstance.
Accessibility and increased value of retirement accounts awarded to supported spouse in stipulated judgment was not a material change of circumstances justifying reduction in spousal support.
As termination of c/s upon Cs’ graduation from high school occurred as expected in original order, cannot reasonably constitute change of circumstances justifying increased s/s. [Caveat]
Modification of support based upon H's impending retirement held premature; must wait to see what circumstances are after retirement.
When termination of H's support based on assumption income from his share of c/p would make him self-supporting, his continued inability to be employed is not change of circumstances.
Increased housing expense occasioned by sale of home per terms of MSA not a change in circumstances.
Income received from a c/p source after property division should not be considered as income for purposes of a showing changed circumstances.
Court improperly considered $15,000 which W received from sale of a vacant lot as factor in reducing her spousal support.
May not modify spousal support in future based upon paying spouse's eligibility to retire.
Can't use spousal support to rectify property division; not changed circumstances.
Changed circumstance must affect economic situation of parties.
Cases holding showing of changed circumstances insufficient to justify modification of spousal support.
Wife’s increased debt not per se a change of circumstances.