PRETRIAL ADJUDICATION
...Pleading
......Complaints
.........Designation of Cause of Action
............Pleading Inconsistently
4 Cards On This Topic:
  • Causes of action inconsistent with each other may be pleaded.
  • Ct. may take judicial notice of prior inconsistent pleadings; if no proper explanation for inconsistencies ct. may conclude cause of action is sham and dismiss.
  • If uncertainty as to facts or theory for claim exists, pleader may plead inconsistency or alternatively.
  • While inconsistent legal theories are proper in verified complaint, inconsistent facts are not.