PRETRIAL ADJUDICATION
...Judgment on the Pleadings
......Case Illustrations
28 Cards On This Topic:
  • Court erred in granting judgment on pleadings to Ds, thereby upholding policy of giving lower priority to domestic violence 911 calls than to non domestic violence calls.
  • Judgment on the pleadings for Ds reversed as a misappropriation of likeness claim, concerning only the pecuniary benefits to be derived from the commercial exploitation of a person’s likeness, was assignable to P.
  • CC 1714 precluded any liability claim against passengers in car which struck bicyclist for conspiring with or aiding and abetting adult homeowner by providing alcoholic beverages furnished to driver.
  • Trial court correctly granted D judgment on the pleadings where P did not give it the preliminary 20-day notice as required under CC 3097 before attempting to foreclose on materialman's lien.
  • Parol evidence rule does not apply where extrinsic evidence is being offered not to reconstruct the parties' contractual obligations but to establish a third party's distinct obligations.
  • As "free preview period" book purchaser alleged neither injury nor causation, he lacked standing to pursue UCL claim against Time for billing him; court correctly granted Time judgment on pleadings and sustained its demurrer.
  • Judgment on the pleadings properly granted to D drug rehab treatment facilities as they did not owe public a legal duty of care to control criminal behavior of facility residents.
  • Judgment on pleadings reversed: Default judgment against P's companies had no collateral estoppel effect where P not in privity with companies.
  • P not required to exhaust admin. remedies before filing suit where hospital staff bylaws grievance procedure provided him with no right to hearing nor opportunity to provide evidence; Judgment on pleadings reversed.
  • As exculpatory clause in lease did not shield lessor from liability for active negligence, judgment on pleadings erroneously granted.
  • In absence of evidence that Family Support Div.'s procedures were state mandated or county initiated for §1983 purposes, court erred in granting County's motion for judgment on pleadings.
  • Termination of lawsuit based on parol evidence rule constitutes favorable termination for malicious prosecution purposes.
  • Cross-complaint originating in dissolution action may form basis for W's malicious prosecution action; dismissal on demurrer and judgment on pleadings reversed.
  • U.S.-Japan peace treaty expressly preempted state law which would have allowed WWII prisoners of war used as slave labor by Japanese companies to sue them; trial ct. erred in overruling Ds' demurrers and denying their judgment on pleadings.
  • Judgment on pleadings for defendant Allstate reversed where policyholders stated facts supporting delayed discovery rule re Northridge earthquake damages.
  • Private reproval by State Bar still matter of public record and member’s disciplinary history may be posted on Bar’s internet website; dismissal following judgment on pleadings affirmed.
  • Court erred in granting judgment on the pleadings re malicious prosecution action where probable cause did not support both negligence and fraud causes of action in underlying suit.
  • Public boat dock ramp is not a "trail" such as to come under Gov. Code §831.4 immunity and trial court erred in granting City judgment on the pleadings.
  • Judgment on pleadings proper as W's exercise of power of appointment not valid where trust required that power be exercised by will or codicil.
  • As motion for judgment on pleadings functions as gen’l demurrer, attacking defects on face of pleadings, extrinsic evidence not proper.
  • Judgment on pleadings improperly granted where complaint pled in general terms basic elements of cause of action for professional negligence.
  • Judgment on the pleadings admits the truth of all material facts alleged in the complaint, therefore not appropriate where complaint contains triable issues of fact.
  • Judgment on pleadings appropriate if allegations in complaint fail to state cause of action, and grounds appear on face of complaint or are based on facts judicially noticeable.
  • Where written instruments are foundation of claim or defense and incorporated in pleading, judgment on pleadings granted only if instrument conclusively negates express allegation.
  • D entitled to judgment on the pleadings if P’s complaint does not state a cause of action; pleading which on its face is barred by SOL does not state a cause of action.
  • JP motion, like general demurrer, challenges sufficiency of P’s cause of action, raising legal, not factual issue.
  • A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the purpose and effect of a general demurrer and must show complaint fails to state cause of action.
  • Nonstatutory motion could be made at any time during the suit or trial as general demurrer rules apply and general demurrer grounds are never waived.