CHILDREN AND THE LAW
...
Delinquency Matters
......
Disposition
.........
Removal From Home
............Findings
10 Cards On This Topic:
Court may limit parental control of minor and remove minor from home.
Whenever court limits right of parent or guardian to make educational or developmental services decisions for M, it shall appoint a responsible adult to make educational or developmental services decisions.
Juv. court lacked jurisdiction over Office of Education and could not require it to fund educational placement of difficult-to-control dependent C; court should have appointed responsible adult under W&IC 726(b).
Committing diabetic M to DJJ did not violate ADA.
Juvenile court does not have the discretion to exempt minor from having to register as a sex offender after he's committed to DJJ for engaging in sexual intercourse with child under age 14.
Delinquency laws designed to provide court maximum flexibility to craft suitable orders aimed at rehabilitating ward; juvenile court here misinterpreted W&IC 607 in denying M's motion to vacate CYA commitment.
Evidence of M's use of BB gun during robbery was sufficient to support finding of personal use of a dangerous weapon.
Substantial evidence showed that, against victim's will, M committed forcible rape.
Placing minor on probation in parent’s physical custody, with legal custody with probation dept., does not require same findings as for removal of minor from parents.
Court need not make findings under Welf. & Inst. Code §726 before committing minor to juvenile hall under former Welf. & Inst. Code section 777 (e).