CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE: CIVIL AND CRIMINAL
...Relevance
......Demonstrative Evidence
.........Tape Recordings; Transcripts
............Objections: In General
4 Cards On This Topic:

Objections to tape recordings.

No error in admitting part of D's postarrest taped statement where no reasonable juror would have inferred from the exchange between him and detective that he tacitly admitted having "strangled a girl to death."

Court implicitly exercised Evid. Code §352 discretion in excluding interview tapes re D's "state of mind".

Where one party introduces part of conversation, opposing party may admit other part, to place excerpts in context or correct misleading impression; court may exercise Evid. Code §352 discretion.