CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE: CIVIL AND CRIMINAL
...Opinion & Scientific Evidence
......Lay Opinion
.........Proper Subjects
............Mental State; Sanity
7 Cards On This Topic:
  • W's opinion about D's "maniacin’" state of mind on night of murder was relevant & admissible as based on her perceptions—defining term helped understand testimony; jury would not connect "maniacin’" to D's Sacramaniacs gang.
  • Though D "up to no good" when he invited V into alley, evidence suggested V used unlawful force first and D entitled to assert imperfect self-defense.

  • Trial court's exclusion of witness testimony supporting defense of imperfect self-defense was not prejudicial to D where he was able to claim that defense and jury heard evidence supporting it.
  • Lay person permitted to give opinion of own mental condition.
  • Officer properly permitted to testify that D understood conversation and was responsive and descriptive in discussing jail housing.
  • Friend of deceased may state opinion re sanity, but may not answer hypothetical based upon facts developed from other witnesses.
  • Lay person properly permitted to testify re opinion relating to whether another was acting rationally.